By GM (Anonymous)

An Eastern European President was told in a letter dated May 27, 2022:

Madam President,

A reason for this letter is Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s refusal to apply any analytical ability to the situation in his country, the wider region and the world himself, or to take the advice of world leaders and those around him who have so far approached him with the view that the military action in Ukraine should cease and denazification should be completed. President Zelenskyy is in no way respectful, not to mention obedient, to his parents’ Soviet in nature understanding of war and peace, which they undoubtedly hold concerning these two matters, but especially when their own child commits to the opinion that the Russian Federation is currently at war with Ukraine and that it is what he perceives as an archetypal enemy – of Ukraine, Europe and the world. Apparently, in President Zelenskyy’s mind, “the world” is precluded to the contemporary for this dispensation world system. Nothing more. In his view, “civilization”, “culture”, “modernity”, “democracy” and “freedom” are all separate rubrics he attributes to his definition of “the world”. Russia, judging by his statements, is the “enemy” of those and, as President Zelenskyy claims, he is more than a fan of those – a proponent, supporter, propagator and propeller who, according to him, lays his life down and supports those compatriots of his who lay their lives down for these ideas. He is not a philosophical or ideological determinant. It is not clear what philosophical school of thought he is siding with or drawing upon. What thinkers and ideologists he has read and studied or agrees with is unclear too. One can pretty confidently take him to be an individual who doesn’t even know that one has to study and receive input and form philosophical and ideological views, and then, after having these established, form political views and positions, having gained the understanding of how politics works. He doesn’t strike one as a person who has done that, and even believe in the necessity of doing it, but seems like someone who thinks what he does is done under inspiration. President Zelenskyy doesn’t display even an elementary grasp that politics and governing are not practised like that at all. They are not a matter of talent and are not forged as an artistic presentation. They must not be played as a fictional character. Politics and life in general are not a theater for one’s improvization on a theme of someone’s idea, and with the use of someone’s in advance-prepared words. In life, one doesn’t borrow anything from anyone – one is just being themselves.

With this letter, you are being approached with the idea to convey this to President Zelenskyy, because you seem like the type of person he would respond to. He would respond better to a woman. You were both born in the Soviet Union. He would feel less threatened by a female voice, and that of someone who, like him, was once a pioneer and then a member of the Komsomol. It would be just like once upon a time in the classroom, where equal young individuals sat at the desk next to each other, explained things to one another, helped one another and looked after each other. After all, President Zelenskyy seems like someone who is missing this kind of life of camaraderie and total equality, or he has emotionally remained somewhere there – perhaps a difficulty in transiting from childhood to manhood or a “failure to launch” of some kind. But he is emotionally underdeveloped, visible from his desire to show off and be constantly approved by someone who according to him “has it all together” and “has arrived” at the place he is headed but is not quite there. In any case, as you probably know (but one has no way of knowing that), mature people are in no need of constant guidance and affirmation – the first one they get from God, and the second they have learned, believed and embraced, also from God, via their parents and/or siblings and relatives since childhood, and then directly from God as they grew up. President Zelenskyy doesn’t need a softer touch, but it would be easier for him to receive truthful things about himself and his actions from a stranger whom he can relate to. Perhaps you are convinced that this is so because you may be already aware that when French President Macron reached out in a man-to-man, and not only national leader to national leader, conversation on the subject of a ceasefire, after forty minutes of conversation, like a teenager begged by his parent, President Zelenskyy responded in: “History, however, does not forgive sidesteps; if you seek to take back what’s yours, there is only one way to go – forward.” The described reaction is found in the article “Macron suggested Ukraine give up some of its sovereignty to allow Putin to save face, says Zelensky” (May 13, 2022, Yahoo News).

Western propagandist “news” and “reporting” tried to make a greater thing of President Zelenskyy’s Jewish ethnicity than what this subject deserves. It was some kind of PR, of course, because at the World Economic Forum, two Jewish people made suggestive exchanges, as depicted by The Daily Mail on May 24, 2022 in the article “Henry Kissinger tells Ukraine it should give Russia territory to try to find a peace deal – as Zelensky insists Putin has ‘no interest in talking’”: “Henry Kissinger has said that the West should stop trying to inflict a crushing defeat on Russia and suggested that Ukraine should give up territory. Former US secretary of state Mr Kissinger, 98, told the World Economic Forum held in Davos, Switzerland that Ukraine must begin negotiations ‘before it creates upheavals and tensions that will not be easily overcome’. ‘Ideally, the dividing line should be a return to the status quo ante. Pursuing the war beyond that point would not be about the freedom of Ukraine, but a new war against Russia itself,’ he told the conference on Monday. It came as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a powerful speech to open this week’s Davos summit in Switzerland that brute force will once again rule the world if Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is allowed to go unanswered. He told delegates that their summit will become pointless if Putin is allowed to win the war because he is ‘not interested in our thoughts’ and ‘brute force… does not talk, it kills.’ But Mr Kissinger said it would be ‘fatal’ for the West to get swept up in the ‘mood of the moment’ and forget Russia’s position of power within Europe. According to The Telegraph, he explained that Russia was an ‘essential part of Europe’ for over four centuries, noting that European leaders must ‘not lose sight of the longer term relationship’ or otherwise risk putting Russia in a permanent alliance with China. He also said: ‘I hope the Ukrainians will match the heroism they have shown with wisdom.’ […] Zelensky’s speech came at the start of four days of talks during which Ukraine is expected to launch a global charm offensive in order to secure economic and military backing to ensure its survival. […] ‘The main theme for this year’s Davos [summit] is: “History at a Turning Point”’, Zelensky told a packed auditorium on Monday morning. ‘This year, the words “turning point” are more than a rhetorical talking point.’”

You can see for yourself the boyishness of using such puffed up and really meaningless phrases which are expressive of an “I couldn’t care less” attitude – a sheer sign of rebellion used by tantrum- throwing teenagers who aim to twist the arm of their parents and cause them to give permission for something they know they shouldn’t ask for. What else is the meaning of “brute force”, nobody “interested in our thoughts”, “turning point”, “more than a rhetorical talking point”? The West did much to cause this well over 40 father of two children to sound like one of them, with so many statements in the press, and especially video messages, with the same pomposity talking about made up and nonexistent “offensives” and “victories”, and also the opposite of reality regarding the Russians, with staged “atrocities”, and here you have, three months later, after this constant bombardment 24/7, he is told in front of the whole world to hold his horses, and that all his alleged “victories” boil down to a war for “survival”. A lack of experience or knowledge cannot be satisfactory, let alone compensate the well-established, high-ranking Ukrainian military personnel who are actually out there taking the fighting, under artillery and not only under the sound of the cannonades. Yet President Zelenskyy is unconcerned not only with the honor of his Generals like General Zaluzhny, but with the fact that the military have no say on the matter of the battle. They have become exposed to a danger of peril, and to ridicule from the world. President Zelenskyy is obviously incompetent and runs a dictatorship, but the question is who wants him to do that? On whose orders? The Bible says that one becomes like the one they worship (Psalm 115:8). By the fruits one can know who his mentors are, because their attitudes and actions will be similar. That is a principle which applies to all people. God has left a place in the heart of each person for Himself, and has made humans in His image and likeness. When that place is not filled with God, something else fills it, and it is visible who indwells them and what they are involved with.

President Zelenskyy looks like someone who probably has played many video games in which violence, bondage, bloodshed, torture, supremacy, psychological depravities and mind games must have been involved. No way has he just read or watched “Harry Potter”, “The Lord of the Rings” or “The Hunger Games”. There is more than that, and that is why he finds a common language with nazified, fascicized elements. Simply, he has become a friend with them and their philosophies. The Bible says that bad company corrupts good morals. People influence each other. It is not known in the Ukrainian case who has influenced whom, but through education (school textbooks reveal it), media and country-to-country associations, Ukraine has become a hub for strange philosophies, ideologies and spirits which have plagued not only, but predominantly, the young generation. The people are struggling to find meaning, and not only means, for survival and life. The churches have been present. Faith in God has been in existence in that realm. Socialism and communism never attacked the faith of the people. The religious expression and ritualism have, for various reasons mostly related to the population’s work activities, been discouraged, but since God, the Creator of life, Whose eyes are on the believer (1 Peter 3:12) and Whose thoughts are for good and not for evil, to give him a future and a hope (Jeremiah 29:11), has been there, the Source of life and hope, ideas and meaning for everyone has been too.

In God’s economy, every human being is precious and important. God has a plan for each person, and in advance-prepared works for each life (Ephesians 2:10). No life should be discarded – God wants everyone to come to Him, every soul to be saved by repenting of one’s sins (because every man is a sinner) and asking Jesus Christ to come into their life. The people who do that become born again of the Spirit of God, Who enters their lives. They will not perish, but have an everlasting life (John 3:16), and they will spend eternity in the presence of God after physical death. The life of every Ukrainian, Russian, Moldovan and other person is precious. Jesus Christ hung and died on the cross so that everyone is reconciled to God through His death, and is resurrected through the Holy Spirit, and becomes immortal, living with God forever. Life is not precluded to the physical realm and doesn’t end with it. President Zelenskyy doesn’t have a vision for the people who have entirely lost direction and fallen into neo-Nazism to be restored to society and to enter a relationship with God, and for there to be a destination of Heaven in eternity for them. He has no such vision for other citizens of Ukraine or anywhere in the world. He doesn’t even have it for himself. That is disturbing, because Jesus died for him and God loves him, and here he is playing war games, begging for more weapons and carelessly wasting his time and other humans’ time while being here on earth, when this time is but a handful of decades at best in which a person should do that which God has preordained and prepared in order for everyone to reach that described relationship with Him, and to live with Him while in the body, and then to spend eternity with all the other believers and saints of God. Nobody should leave the physical realm without this becoming a reality in their life. Each human is a human spirit with a physical body and a soul, the last consisting of the mind, will and emotions.

President Zelenskyy has to grow up and start acting responsibly with his own life and the lives of others – no game, no drama. Somebody has to tell him this. Would you tell him this? It is possible that the people around him no longer want to follow his dictates and decide to do something about it. Who would not do a thing about being free to do what they feel in their conscience is the right thing to do? It applies to ex-President [of Moldova] Igor Dodon too, who is currently under house arrest. Whatever idea he has is utterly superseded by the ideas which were just shared with you. Can you let that man go free, although in your opinion his views on society, how it is structured, how it operates, may be wrong? Still, he has to find that out for himself. You can preach at President Dodon, but he cannot be locked up because of what he thinks, or even what he says, if there is no prohibition for these things in any statute of the moral (biblical) and civil law (of the land). The law has to be impartial. You can check for yourself and see whether you agree with a statement: if Guccifer did prison time in the USA and Romania for what he did, Christo Grozev must do prison time for what he did. You are also admonished to give consideration to the very real possibility that President Zelenskyy will go to prison for what happened in Ukraine during his tenure, the reason for which statement is that the President must be held responsible for the decision to involve armed forces and citizens (individually and in militarized groups) in military actions. Those are decisions taken by the President, who is the Commander-in-Chief. They are not taken on any referendum and there is no council of government officials or Parliamentary body responsible, it is solely a decision of one person: the Ukrainian President.

What is humorous, if there is any humor in the entire story, is that his understanding of governing and politics is based on film-watching, for example “Air Force One” (starring Harrison Ford as the President of the USA taken hostage by a Russian terrorist while aboard Air Force One), seen, in addition to the described earlier obvious state of lacking education and experience in politics, in his latest video “performance” (because what else is his message) where the government’s “Plan B” is disclosed. Why go to all the trouble to explain to potentially the world, and not just his social media followers, what is actually reassuring himself that he has very well understood the recently learned “constitutional position” of the President, Prime Minister and Parliament Speaker, and the “constitutional procedure” in the event of the fatality of one of these three? It is not an altogether completely different matter, but a due generalization that President Zelenskyy’s “Presidential” presentation throughout the conflict, and why not his entire political career, and perhaps everything that led to it, when looked at by an unbiased observer, follow too closely (that anyone should miss) famous movie scripts. There is no question that he is fulfilling a task masterminded by somebody else and works with whatever he has at his disposal. Somebody has to have deceived him once upon a time that he is more of an actor that a lawyer, the latter of which he pursued as a professional career.

President Zelenskyy obviously draws on inspiration from movies because he has received far too many ovations for his acting, instead of putting hours and years into refining what he studied to be – a minister of jurisprudence. Sometimes, girlfriends and wives can have that effect on a young man, or even parents who fall in love with their child once again when their child reaches puberty and begins developing into the man or woman the parents couldn’t wait to have (with a lessened demand for care and maintenance) after the hassle and the burden of having to change diapers, endless feeding sessions, sleepless nights, teething, inoculations, enrollments in kindergarten and elementary school, homework, confronting behavioral issues, correcting bad habits, bad friends and a company of those, early romantic sentiments, reading bad books, and nowadays visiting wrong sites unsupervised by the parents. Perhaps the Ukrainian President’s wife is an ambitious person or “100% Ukrainian”. Because what is the streak of nationalism, never before put so high on the priority “to do” list of any Soviet person regardless of which exact part of the Soviet Union they or their ancestors may have come from? It was one country of many nationalities, united and equal, right? It is undeniable. In President Zelenskyy’s prolific sticking to movie scripts, one wonders where the place for “Apocalypse Now” (1979) and the famous performance of Marlon Brando may be. The way it goes, the Ukrainians’ treatment of Ukraine is like a forgotten American Army unit down the Mekong River. The people are out of their minds, exposed to the elements and drug abuse, and foreign to them spirits and religions, hit by cultism, with one man on top of everybody playing God. There comes a time when the one protected by everybody becomes worshiped as a deity, but being totally demonized and having no enemies to fight, he begins to be hated by those who initially protected and then worshipped him. At the end, they destroyed him, not the enemy.

When lives are led in the fantastical culture of militancy and aggression, and the boundary between reality and fantasy is blurred, the very definition of liminality requires an undetermined grayish-dark zone where anything sinister may happen. People were made to walk in the light of God. The Bible says “Your Word is a lamp to my feet” (Psalm 119:105). It also says “How will the young man keep his way? By taking heed according to Your Word” (Psalm 119:9). In Ukraine, that which was considered sound understanding for close to a century was deemed incorrect and deserted without a decent replacement, spiritual or ideological. You have noticed, no doubt, that in the thirty years after the breakup of the Soviet Union, in many countries of Eastern Europe and perhaps your own, dramatic changes have occurred. And these did not happen without the participation of people like Maria Gabriel, Kristalina Georgieva and yourself. Not everything was about economics and banking, you see. Some of the mentioned were responsible for education, academia, IT, digitalization, media and other spheres through the European Commission. It’s about time that people stopped thinking that the United Nations, World Health Organization, International Red Cross, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, US Federal Reserve, and many such entities, which for ages have been lightheartedly accepted to be fulfilling some kind of good function all to do with humanity and what is good for them, are in fact what has been believed about them. The helpfulness of their nature is alleged, but there is more to it than that, and they are connected with each other and work in concert to fulfill purposes which especially the last decades revealed to not be in the interests of humanity. It has been a foolish sentiment around a sinister and not only fallacious notion, fueled systematically in order to cause the people to put their guard down. That is the plain truth.

Beginning thirty years ago, most Eastern Europeans were brought to the point of looking for places for themselves overseas. Twenty years ago, Eastern Europeans “fought” to become members of the European Union. The paramount ten years ago was to find jobs, and particularly in the UK, where in its capital London, as some Eastern Europeans (already there) verbalized it, there were enough jobs “for the entire Chinese population”. It is no longer mind-boggling for most how wrong they were – it was eventually revealed. There were people who fought against Eastern European countries entering European Union membership status, as it wasn’t the proper direction for these populaces to begin with. The mentioned organizations sided with the West and Western philosophy and ideology on every possible issue and in every possible sphere of life. What happened in Ukraine is exactly what happens and would have happened anywhere where this worldview and philosophy are explicitly follow by people who are not versed in them and are tricked to take them for what they are not. The same happened with everyone (and not only Eastern European) who emigrated to the West, and who didn’t have an alternative to the Western worldview to hold onto strongly and be committed to, whereby being able to resist all the ways of brainwashing and all the other mechanisms which, to put it simply, make one become like a Westerner when they are not prepared to go and fight against what is there.

It turns out that the Mekong River is not a total fantasy which the American screenwriter invented specifically for the film “Apocalypse Now”. There are territorial forces and spirits, and whoever is not covered and protected, and has no particular strong spiritual or ideological determination and sticking to those, has succumbed, and would and will, being befallen by the usual entrapments through “education”, “business opportunity”, “workplace”, “democracy”, “freedoms (including religious)”, “greater opportunity to travel”, which in essence are all economic and spiritual issues allegedly being “improved” in the West for the individual immigrant or those closest to them. However, in terms of society and the due philosophical and ideological critique of it, all the listed are tropes, and they are also talking points for politicization, which happens to not be so subtle in the West, even when people have not completed any School of Government. And the fact that to some besides you or Kristalina Georgieva or Maria Gabriel or others this course was not offered, or that the same people did not attend Klaus Schwab’s Young Global Leaders course, or that the attendance of a George Soros-sponsored “American” or other university somewhere is not a fact in their lives, wasn’t really an issue, was it? Those things, if present, only place their possessor higher in the Western hierarchy, as the West considers these proofs of greater usability. Nothing to do with personal development or progress. They couldn’t care less. The West are not people-developers, they pursue profit.

If it wasn’t like that, they would not have appreciated that free of charge for them professionals only in need of induction into the Western system and nothing else have fallen straight onto their lap by the breaking of the Berlin Wall and the made (through continuous previous deceptions about the West and what it is all about) eager to relocate to the West Eastern Europeans. What could have been easier and cheaper? Who wouldn’t have loved that there? Of course they couldn’t believe their eyes. They had been waiting for such a dream to come true and take away the nightmare, at least temporarily, because they couldn’t see – and how could they see – a way to guarantee perpetual flow of resources for economic and financial success. For some reason, during Mikhail Gorbachev’s tenure, their ultimate wish was granted. The West was extremely happy to make a way in which conscientious students like you would become their functionaries, and when they ensured that you were theirs through and through (through being their “advisers”, under their watchful eye), to send you to your countries to convert the rest. You may disagree, and the numerous others whose lives followed the exact same trajectory as yours may too, but your disagreement about what is being said is not going to change the fact of what actually did happen. It is still happening. The West is up to their neck in Eastern Europe and in what it does perpetually with conflicts and regime changes following their notorious demands and expectations that may be faced with willingness for participation in the Western schemes by people like you. But not by everybody else. History testifies to that. The majority of people is not even aware of what is going on, and here is offered the example of what happens in Ukraine.

In Ukraine, total havoc has been wreaked on their lifestyle and education system, with joblessness and rewriting their textbooks to be consistent with a Western worldview. For evidence, why not look in artefacts such as actual school textbooks? Why not visit the Ukrainian Ministry of Education or local education departments, as some have done? That wouldn’t be difficult for you linguistically, or in any way. What can one learn from a quick overview of the textbooks? Quite a few things about deserting what Soviets, including Ukrainians, thought about themselves, and instead adopting an identity which someone has contrived following their desire to invent it, the result of which is the combination of sheer brutality – an expression President Zelenskyy had a keen appetite for using at Davos – and a specific object of hatred – Russia and the Soviet Union, and their nations. In other words, this self-hatred, and not only lack of sufficient respect for self individually and as a populace since Ukraine was part of the “hated” Soviet peoples, is permeating through the pages of the textbooks. What Bandera? How is a young Ukrainian child supposed to connect with a man of no particular national, religious, political or ideological identity? The man was looking for meaning and tried many things, committed many times and deserted even more times. He started with the Soviets, was provided with an “escape” by the Nazi Germans and then placed in a concentration camp by them. Then the British extracted him from that concentration camp with the intention to milk him as they did you, Kristalina Georgieva, Maria Gabriel, Christo Grozev, Kiril Petkov, Mateusz Morawiecki, Maria Pevchikh, the same as they did with Robert Maxwell, and before that with the whole Frankfurt School, the latter of which there is a good possibility you have never even heard of. Regardless, it is a click away from you, and you can learn what the West doesn’t want Eastern Europeans to know: that the much lauded “superiority” of Western Marxism over the Eastern, Bolshevik form of socialism is totally contrived and fallacious.

One guesses that they didn’t teach you in Harvard that “state capitalism” came about in order to hide that Marxist, socialist nature of the USA and the West. Did they really think the rest of the world was so stupid that they wouldn’t understand that all it was created for was to hide the Marxist nature of their economy? You don’t lack the ability to reach the same conclusion, should you get to it. It may do a lot of good to Eastern Europe if people like you do just that and get to the bottom of the Western reasoning and spirit behind their aggression against the rest they called “East”. What else is to be done? Textbooks should not only correctly present facts, but teach those who learn from them to uphold truths and virtues, and respect themselves and others. The Ukrainian textbooks did the contrary, and the result of uncertainty in the younger generation is not surprising. What LGBTQ+ is President Zelenskyy’s wife head over heels into? She might be appeasing Westerners, but why does she think that they are more superior in any way, so that she should follow them and their philosophy? The answer is very simple: the self-respect issue. The West has divisively suggested Eastern European inferiority, then hammered it upon the heads of Eastern Europeans and forged an entire complex, gold-encrusting it with diplomas, degrees, achievements and even “lifetime success” awards. It lied to you and all that were willing to listen. They knew they were lying. They winked and smiled among themselves about every Eastern European because they feared that the truth about their own insufficiency and lack compared to the Eastern European would come out, and they would not be able to exercise colonial and imperialist dominion and useful for them enslavement. That is their rationalization. God wasn’t considered.

What else is one left with? Did President Zelenskyy’s parents or somebody else around him since his childhood envision him becoming the President of Ukraine? Did your parents? How about Bulgarian Prime Minister Kiril Petkov’s? What about Kristalina Georgieva’s two Orthodox priest grandfathers? People don’t become leaders of nations by accident. It didn’t happen in the Bible, or in any history, and here the world has literally every Eastern European country and former Soviet Republic full of what you call “accidental leader” upon “accidental leader”. Nobody had the slightest idea, nobody prayed, it wasn’t prophesied over anybody by a minister of God, and it just happened on so many occasions. Really? “Accidental” – what else is “unintentionally” becoming a politician, let alone a leader? You must have studied some theory of probability if you really are a possessor of all the degrees listed in your resume. You can shock yourself and search for whether there is another historic dispensation in which anything like that ever happened, and so often. It is not a good enough answer to say “But what could be wrong with good and understanding, benevolent people like Mr Soros, who invest in the lives of other people?” In what other areas do allegedly wealthy Westerners invest allegedly “their” money in the lives and for the benefit of others? Where is the alleged goodness of their hearts in so many other possible prospects of the use of the same money? Is it even theirs? What is your professional reading of the West’s “financial situation” and payability? (Nobody should ask Kristalina Georgieva – she has been bought.) What Russian “default”? Georgieva must be a professional phony. Do the Westerners have the money or don’t they? Isn’t their dire straits situation the one that the West needs the disintegration of the system of socialist countries for? No graduate of any economics university east of Berlin can maintain such views. They are a lie.

Currently in Russia, the steel is expected to be as expensive as gold, yet deceived people who have an incorrect reading of the West, business and the economy, and not only of themselves, rise in what one considers an unreasonable demand from the Russian government (and it is not an isolated case precluded to Russia) to somehow “ease their pain” in not receiving surplus profit anymore. Where did they form their expectations? In the West. What assessment of the economy is it based on? Not even an estimation! These steel producers are taught by the West to doubt in their own economies, to disrespect their elected leaders that these know what they’re doing, and to protest against the “socialism” and “communism” of Russia and Eastern Europe, like they did with the USSR, and to go and destroy the very act of constitutional election and rule, and to enforce that which “is in the West”. But wasn’t this exactly what happened thirty years ago? These producers and businessmen don’t have a clue, because they studied from textbooks like the described ones!

Of course, the world is dealing with agents of foreign powers planted to disseminate false ideas and fight to the death to enforce them. This is what is happening in Ukraine. People with little knowledge are used as fighting machines because they have no self-esteem and accept as given that the West does have knowledge. Eastern Europeans and ex-Soviets constantly think they are in need of improvement. Where is this sense in the Westerners? In their empty pockets and bank accounts? Money and knowledge, and the coming with them power, have been allegations. That has been the case for the last several hundred years, but even so, the West still claims that during that period, life circumstances and some sort of coincidence randomly came all together, only to produce a Western hegemony, which was now, with the Ukrainian conflict, about to be destroyed, because allegedly the West “scared” President Putin by coming too close, and Russia and China might respond in forming an alliance which would “break the equilibrium”.

What absolute nonsense! What equilibrium is Henry Kissinger referring to? The one he modeled according to his PhD dissertation of the period 1948-1954, and the US, Britain and the West stuck to in deceiving in concert the whole world that there was a credible West, and that there was a credible opponent opposite the already existing USSR and system of socialist republics? Few people know that Kissinger forged the concept in his dissertation after the practise of the Habsburg Holy Roman Empire’s diplomat Klemens von Metternich. You would do well to read the dissertation and grasp Kissinger’s view on the “equilibrium” as requiring the “great powers” to decide what is “legitimate” and what is not. It has nothing to do with reality and the truthful fact of how things are. “Equilibrium”? The greatest lie of our dispensation. There is no such thing.

What the West desires is greater than what it has the ability to achieve. The West should be seen for what it is. Eastern Europeans and citizens of former Soviet Republics should not run with all the West’s agendas, thus endangering their own citizens. All they end up doing is inexcusable atrocities like cutting off water, gas and electricity supplies for their own civilian compatriots, or burying 24,000 landmines over 152 hectares of territory in Donbass, or bringing ports to a standstill and even endangering sea travel by placing 12,000 sea mines in the port of Mariupol, or, like Member of Ukrainian Parliament Yulia Grishina, voicing out their threatening intention toward teachers and educators with capital criminal culpability for introducing Russian educational standards in schools, or, like the adviser to the Energy Minister of Ukraine Yelena Zerkal, thinking of a “good plan” of “something happening” to the “Druzhba” gas pipeline, in order to punish foreign citizens (e.g., Hungarian) to be left without gas supplies for opposing the EU embargo on Russian energy imports. Crazy, isn’t it? Land, sea, the city, the village and overseas have become unsafe due to the application of Western worldview and ideology. Of course it will look, up to a certain level, like the West has not suggested any such use of their ideas. Of course they will copyright for something else and disclaim responsibility for any damages or losses. Don’t they do it all the time? They will say that it never crossed their minds, that this is a sick interpretation of what they allegedly believe and stand for as a society and people, up to the degree to which they believe they ought to explain themselves.

Every Eastern European country should stop their contribution to the West (which is what they are doing throughout the current conflict in Ukraine) and let everybody see what happens next, and find out if why Eastern Europeans did it in the first place is not for their falling into the deceptions described above. An Eastern European should not wait for a Westerner to explain their own behavior to them – the Eastern Europeans or the former Soviets have a conscience, and if they happen to be a Christian, God the Holy Spirit, Who lives within them, will give them perfect knowledge of every circumstance they are in, teaching them all things, according to the Bible (John 14:26). Why give away their own initiative and wait passively on the Westerner to pretend and act as if they are an authority and give their “okay” for the Eastern European or former Soviet’s actions? The latter should make a decision. They are made in the image of God and are furnished with a free will. It is their prerogative to make a decision according to what their inner man agrees with. As noted earlier, decisionmaking is not a matter of talent, charisma, articulation, expression, passion, convictions, worldview, professed belief or presentation. Many people are trying very hard (and have done so) to keep out of a place of having to take responsibility for many lives, which have not been lost due to a “Russian invasion” for a “war”, but because of the West’s war on Russia, Ukraine being used as a decoy, and that has turned into President Zelenskyy’s problem. It was preventable, in more than one way. That is not only his problem. The West played the same trick on you, on Kristalina Georgieva, on Maria Gabriel, and on numerous others who are in politics, in academia, in business, in finance, and in many other spheres.

Recently, the Western press and outlets began bringing up the subject of alleged attempts on the lives of President Putin and President Zelenskyy. Reportedly, an attempt on President Putin’s life was foiled, and at least ten such attempts were made on President Zelenskyy’s life, but were unsuccessful. Why bring up such a subject? Perhaps because there is truth behind it in each case, or in a few of them, or perhaps none of them is true, but messages are being sent, lies are being swirled around. The public – the readership and the viewers – are being lied to, or are being prepared for something that is in the works and expected to occur. Nothing is to be taken for granted or believed right away, regardless of what publication is concerned. The West lied prolifically for three months, it censored all Russian and Serbian outlets despite the fact that these had licenses, Eastern European countries received ready-made “news” reports from institutions in the West. There was deliberate disinformation. The collective West, proxy President Zelenskyy, waged war on Russia, but tried to keep it covert. It even got Henry Kissinger, as evidenced above, in a “cameo” which was not what it seemed at a glance. It may seem otherwise to some, but to the one addressing you, Kissinger spoke about 400 years of Russian presence in Europe because the collective West, the philosophy of which he actively embodied, not only in this presentation but since World War 2, takes it that Russia strives for legitimacy, which would only be satisfied if publicly and from a high place it is said before the whole world that it was on the historic scene for that long. And how wrong they are! According to the West as well, Russia struggles for recognition of its potency – a stupid sentiment to consider this great country nothing more than a mere “Eastern” country (because what else is a “Eurasian” country), as an Orientalist like them would say, and for the “Eastern” people, what else is important, other than their male potency, Westerners think? This is unfortunately where the West is and has been for several centuries – the same prejudices, stereotypes, cliches, marginalization, racism, colonialism, neocolonialism and imperialism. These are a mockery of the Russians’ intelligence and view of self. Such statements and attitudes are expressions of spirits of mockery and demeaning – weapons of psychological warfare. The West are guilty of it, they own it, they haven’t repented about it, they operate in it non-stop. This horrible sense of Western superiority is applied and actively operational against the citizens of Russia and the wider Eastern European region, and since before and during the Soviet Union and community of socialist states era.

Kissinger was sending message after message in Davos: “Feel free to take the mostly occupied by Russians Crimea, Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic, President Putin”. What was this all about, since during US President Donald Trump’s tenure, Mr Kissinger stated that “Crimea should be left to the Russians”? His meeting with President Trump, at which he made that statement, can be viewed on YouTube. Now, it was a message to those at Davos, but this message was made in the form that provided the Russians with the understanding that everything is left in the hands of President Zelenskyy to decide whether he should comply with the West’s “advice” to “let go”. This is what it was all about. Whatever happens was projected to be the decision made by an obviously ill-qualified and inexperienced, insubordinate to anybody and completely on his own President (or an actor playing the role of a President) of Ukraine. Hilarious, isn’t it? But scary at the same time. Some people are so daringly, openly ungodly. The West lied to the world so many times. They lied to Mikhail Gorbachev. Yuriy Andropov and Mikhail Gorbachev took the bait of “scientific and technical development”, “computers everywhere”, “disarmament”, “privatization”, etcetera. Alternatively, should one think they were foreign agents? What followed is you, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kristalina Georgieva, Maria Gabriel, Kiril Petkov, Mateusz Morawiecki, Eduard Heger, and even Klaus Iohannis. Of course, the West overwhelmed people like you, they belittled you and demonstrated before you only what they wanted you to see and realize about them. You were disciplined, submissive, following instructions and had the enthusiasm of somebody who thinks they are achieving a great deal. And then they planted you in governments, others in academia, in media, in business, in banking, in major industries, in your own countries as agents of the West. All of you must have adopted not only their teachings, and mannerisms, and customs, and culture, and lifestyle, and traditions, and philosophy, and ideologies. They give you some, however false, sense of greatness, and you habitually, and out of fear of losing these, propel their agendas in your own countries. You think like them, you act like them, you dress like them, you speak like them, you live like them, and you are them. You disagree? Perhaps you haven’t met or haven’t even heard about people who, unlike all of you, did not agree to cooperate with the West, and you don’t know what happens then. There are people who know. They are not sorry that they refused to grant the West its wish. The point is not what Kissinger or others in the West think, but that God is not them, and that people should try and please God instead of being men-pleasers. That is a duty with which a man is born, and there is a responsibility to fulfill it and give an account for it at the end.

The Western part of the world teaches that “manners maketh man”, which is a proverb referenced first is in the work of Englishman William Horman – headmaster of Eton College and then Winchester College in the late 15th century. To the English, it may have been satisfactory to live according to proverbs like this, whereby the West, following in their footsteps, has wrongfully been taught to consider speaking with “please” and “thank you” as spiritual virtues, but the Bible says that God gives the Christian believer everything that is necessary for life and godliness (2 Peter 1:3). Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair coined the phrase “giving bad news with a smile”. The same was practised during the Iraq War “on terror” and chasing after “weapons of mass destruction”. All the world ever witnessed besides such demagogical proverbs being applied to unbelievably improper situations and contexts was how Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was found hiding in that hole dug in the ground and the indescribable mockery of his person, in total contrast to how God expects His creation to be treated by anyone. As if the world was ever to forget that, the same thing happened to Muammar Ghaddafi. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have not yet been held responsible. They only left the world with the documented catchphrase “We came. We saw. He died. Ha ha ha ha”. So much for Western “civilization”, “culture” and “modernization”, which all should instead be called godlessness.

Unlike the Westerners, perhaps you have the capacity to grasp and acknowledge that the Soviet Union and Russia never went to war after World War 2, except when helping the Afghans on the invitation of their elected government. It so happened that, like now, the collective West made a point of supplying weapons and ammunition to the “moderates”. Finally, the Soviet Union, just before disintegrating, had considered the losses and walked out of Afghanistan. Mikhail Gorbachev, who is still available for interviews, can tell who talked him into making that move after Perestroika, and just before breaking the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the USSR. Perhaps you can ask him all these questions because you were quite young then, and it is conceivable that by studying in the West and under intense brainwashing, you have forgotten everything that you witnessed and studied. And today, like President Zelenskyy and the mentioned recently come to prominence Eastern European leaders, and many other millennials from the former socialist states, you hold views contrary to those of the majority of your countries’ populations. Depending on how much brainwashing you people have sustained, you may even not be aware, or you may be taught to not pay attention to the latter fact. The majorities of your countries are not spiritually, philosophically and ideologically with you, but you cannot lock them all up, can you? That wouldn’t be biblical, and it wouldn’t be constitutional, would it? Not everything can be sent to the “political” margin.

The West should have never made itself an enemy of God in capturing innocent people and their children and making them similar to themselves just to perpetuate themselves the way they are. They are decaying and in need of God. If anyone was to become a President according to the will of God, they would have wanted to go into politics. If a person doesn’t want to be involved with politics, then why would they pick the Harvard School of Government to study? You see, people project an image, but their actions speak louder. What does it matter what others say, when the person’s actions say so much, as touching anything? It is simple. The West doesn’t get it, but the Eastern Europeans do. If this principle is applied, maybe the Generals around President Zelenskyy, if not him, will respond to this message.

G.M.

The letter which you just read was sent on May 27, 2022 to the Moldovan President, the Soviet-born and at the time 50-year-old graduate of the Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (as a Bachelor of Business Management), the Academy of Public Administration of Moldova (as a Master of International Affairs) and the Harvard School of Government (as a Master of Public Policy) Maia Sandu. Between 2010 and 2012, she had worked as an adviser to the Executive Director of the World Bank. In 2020, a year and a half before being sent the above communication by the one writing, she had been elected President, at which ceremony of swearing her in as such, she addressed the nation that had elected her in Moldovan, Russian, Ukrainian, Gagauz and Bulgarian. Nine and a half months after one’s addressing of her, on March 16, 2023, the Moldovan Parliament approved a law on referring to the national Moldovan language as “Romanian” in all legislative texts and the Constitution. Six days later, on March 22, Maia Sandu promulgated the law as the President of Moldova. The Moldovan national identity, as evidenced by this fact, had begun to suffer and give in to Western pressure to make moves toward a possible merging with neighboring Romania, which was already a European Union member state. The overpowering of national leaders of the Eastern European and post-Soviet realm has thus been evidenced to be present too.

Five months after writing to Moldovan President Maia Sandu, the very near to Moldova territory of Odessa, of Ukraine, started to be brought to the attention of the military personnel of other nearby state entities, like those of Romania, Bulgaria, Poland and Slovakia. On October 26, 2022, letters on Odessa began to be sent by the one writing to Commander of the “Getica” National Training Center in Cincu, Romania Colonel I. Cristurean, Commander of the 10th Engineer Brigade of Romania Colonel G. Calin, Commander of the 8th Multiple Rocket Launcher Brigade of Romania Colonel D. Condruz, Commander of the Special Operations Command of Romania Brigadier General D. Serban and Executive Director of “VMZ” EAD Sopot, Bulgaria I. Stoenchev. Then, on the next day, October 27, an extended version of the same letter was addressed to Commander of the 17th Greater Poland Mechanized Brigade Brigadier General D. Kosowski, Commander of the 2nd Mechanized Brigade of Bulgaria Brigadier General S. Hristov, Commander of the 61st Mechanized Brigade of Bulgaria Brigadier General D. Deshkov, Commander of the 3rd Air Base of the Bulgarian Air Force Brigadier General N. Rusev, Commander of the 24th Air Base of the Bulgarian Air Force Brigadier General D. Ivanov, Commander of the 16th Air Base of the Bulgarian Air Force Colonel F. Angelov and Deputy Director of the Lest Military Training Center in Slovakia Colonel L. Gulas. On October 28, this piece of writing reached Commander of the 8th Anti-Aircraft Regiment of Poland Colonel S. Malik, Commander of the 5th Artillery Regiment of Poland Colonel G. Parol, Commander of 7th Coastal Defense Brigade of Poland Colonel R. Kopka, Commander of the 10th Armored Cavalry Brigade of Poland Brigadier General G. Barabieda, Commander of the 21st Podhale Rifles Brigade of Poland Brigadier General D. Lewandowski, Commander of the 2nd Reconnaissance Regiment of Poland Colonel K. Sarnowski, Commandant of the 1st Military Field Hospital of Poland Colonel W. Wojcicki and Commander of the 1st Aviation Brigade of Poland Colonel P. Saniuk. Not only military personnel but the political, governmental, administrative and academic leadership of many countries in the area of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union were sent a copy of the letter presenting Odessa in its proper context and as part of the larger “Jewish problem”, which was being attempted by the West to receive its “proper resolution” through the “Russia-Ukraine” conflict. The list of recipients of this letter numbers in the range of many thousands – until the beginning of August of 2023, and later on many more until 2024, they received the text below as a passage of a larger communication:

Sir,

[…]

Where were the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s friends or all of the participants at the Munich Security Conference on February 19, 2022, where he started “bringing up” the subject of a “dirty bomb” with the ease and flair of a rebel, so definitively recognizable by the “I couldn’t care less” attitude and not only posture, when stating: “I want to believe that the North Atlantic Treaty and Article 5 will be more effective than the Budapest Memorandum. Ukraine has received security guarantees for abandoning the world’s third nuclear capability. We don’t have that weapon. We also have no security”? Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. As such, it had the named capabilities. This, however, seems to have escaped Zelenskyy’s attention, if his speech is taken as a sample proving what his view on the matter was. Nobody corrected him – either for reason of ill-understood “friendship” with him, or because of adherence to a “higher” than Zelenskyy authority which commanded and demanded that silence, and not only his obviously contrived speech before the same conference. It so happened that Zelenskyy spoke before the world, even that part of it which was not present at the Munich Security Conference. But even over two years after that “security event” on February 19, 2022, nobody has corrected themselves on them lacking a statement. Are they still under the “obligation” to adhere to whoever forbade them to voice out the truth in the first place? Zelenskyy’s penchant for going around things and stating what he wished his audience to hear, even if it meant that his speech would be doctored and he would be coached to say the “correct” talking points, was demonstrated right there, in February 2022. He criticized alleged insufficiencies found in the Budapest Memorandum, whereby he first disregarded the identical “state” in which the former Soviet Republics of Belarus and Kazakhstan must have found themselves, and secondly he could have expressed his dissatisfaction with the security provided through the same memoranda with representatives of the states by which they were signed. He could have contacted US Major General William H. Burns, the first US special envoy to denuclearization negotiations with former Soviet countries, if not directly, then through the liaising role of his son, CIA Director William Burns.

Alternatively, Zelenskyy could have explored or directly used his own and others’ Jewish roots or benevolence toward Jews. One possible candidate for this could have been American Dr Peter Vincent Pry. Apparently, Dr Pry started off as a Verification Analyst in the US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency in 1984, followed by a quick entry the very next year into the office of an Intelligence Officer with the CIA responsible for analyzing Soviet and Russian nuclear strategy, operational plans, military doctrine, threat perceptions, and developing US paradigms for strategic warning, where Pry was during the Soviet Perestroika, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the signing of the Budapest Memoranda, right up until 1995. He was the Executive Director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, a Congressional advisory board dedicated to achieving the protection of the United States from electromagnetic pulse (EMP) and other threats on an accelerated basis. President Zelenskyy could have turned to Dr Pry all the time before August 19, 2022, when Pry passed, because up to that day he was also the Director of the United States Nuclear Strategy Forum, an advisory body to the US Congress on policies to counter Weapons of Mass Destruction, and not only a highly acclaimed “friend of Israel and ethnic Jews”. So much for democratically elected government organs in the USA! Apparently, Dr Pry initially graduated with a PhD in history from the State University of New York and then made a single publication of “Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal”, which earned him both a fellowship at the University of California and a second PhD in international relations from that institution. How he fulfilled the duty of an expert on nuclear strategy with alleged history and international relations knowledge around his waist is a mystery. However, the fact that he was useful to worldwide Jewry for decades is not. President Zelenskyy could have availed himself of Dr Pry’s benevolent disposition in order for Ukraine’s national security to be improved.

Does the Ukrainian President mean to convince the world that he didn’t notice another potentially beneficial fact for his country’s protection: that so conveniently for someone, on February 22, 2022, two days before the start of the Russian special military operation in Donbass, the son of the considered legendary friend of Ukraine and Jews worldwide, and Jewish person himself, Polish-born US National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, Mark Brzezinski, stepped into the office of US Ambassador to Poland after being in the area, so to speak, for years as the US Ambassador to Sweden, although he was readied for the Polish position since August 4, 2021, when he was officially nominated by President Joe Biden, and was sworn in as the US Ambassador to Poland on January 19, 2022 by Vice President Kamala Harris? And Poland neighbors Ukraine! So Mark Brzezinski was almost in Ukraine, but not exactly, like a doctor on call! Brzezinski could have been helpful. And maybe he was and is, and even in more than one way, but why keep the world guessing, unless this is some kind of game of words and projections similar to the one which commenced on October 29, 2022 with President Zelenskyy publicly blaming Russia in playing “hunger games” with the world for nothing deserved, but simply stopping its participation in the “grain deal” because it learned that it had been manipulated into a game it could not afford – it would simply mean sharing in the sins of others, and respectively receiving the punishment for doing so? The Brzezinski family’s direct involvement with Ukraine has not been hidden, but in fact the opposite was quite openly and demonstratively pointed at as somewhat of a “plus” feature on the family’s resume – both in the area of Ukrainian security and the country’s general importance, especially in relation to Russia. Back in 1993-1995 – exactly when the named Budapest Memorandum for which President Zelenskyy showed an apparent dislike was signed – Ian Brzezinski, Mark Brzezinski’s older brother, unsurprisingly functioned as a volunteer adviser to the government of Ukraine, where he assisted Ukraine’s National Security Council, Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry and Parliament. But very importantly, who can ever forget the having become famous words of Ian and Mark’s father Zbigniew in his 2012 book “Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power”: “It cannot be stressed enough that without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be an empire, but with Ukraine suborned [bribed or otherwise induced to commit an unlawful act such as perjury – willfully telling an untruth or making a misrepresentation under oath] and then subordinated [by the Russians], Russia automatically becomes an empire”? A remarkable demonstration of interest in Ukraine, no doubt! And still, it would appear that there has been a game of “experts’ reading” of Russia, foreseeing that it would tempt or cause Ukraine to do something unlawful, which act would open a door that would give the Russians a foothold, while in the same two-character game, Ukraine is envisioned as eventually giving in and being subdued. About five years before his passing, without going back on it, this is what was on former US National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski’s horizon on Ukraine. Because his demonstrated comprehension of “empire” is not just incomplete but altogether inconsistent with what comprises an imperial state, it makes all the sense why today so many national leaders and politicians have taken a detour from rationality, and utter chaos on the subject of Ukraine is impossible to not see. Also, noticeably, Zbigniew Brzezinski published the named book exactly a year before the start of the Euromaidan, which was de facto a state coup in Ukraine, as overturning the result of legitimate and fairly held elections there! But because of the Brzezinski family’s obvious continuous involvement, at his own time of choosing and even leisure, President Zelenskyy could have discussed the downfalls he saw in the Budapest Memorandum and Ukrainian security with them, if that would have been okay and permissible as far as national and international law is concerned, of course – both in his country and in the USA, and in every other country. Does it appear that anyone at all objected?

Another feasible variant of President Zelenskyy using the Jewish roots could have been similar to the way Russian Jewish TV personality and 2018 Presidential candidate opposite Vladimir Putin Ksenia Sobchak did when she got herself into a real tight situation after her coercing colleagues’, people in the broadcasting industry’s and others’ extortion scheme got reported and exposed. She must have felt insecure in Russia in 2022, despite her mother Lyudmila Narusova (of half Jewish extraction) being a Russian Federation Senator, and despite her father Anatoliy Sobchak being rather a cosmopolitan and of no ethnic Russian or Jewish extraction whatsoever, but nevertheless allegedly the co-author of the Russian Constitution, in partnership with Professor Lawrence Lessig from the Center for Constitutionalism in Eastern Europe at the University of Chicago. If one takes their orientation about what is what and who is who from the British propaganda media, one would definitely struggle to come to terms with how very threatened Sobchak must have felt in order to make the dramatic and dangerous move to even consider escaping from Russia to any place, connected to Jewry or not, since she allegedly is President Vladimir Putin’s goddaughter, as claimed by The Guardian in its October 27, 2022 article titled “Russian journalist and Putin’s rumoured goddaughter flees to Lithuania”. Wow! The British media didn’t find it intriguing enough that some of their media colleagues in Russia claimed on October 28, 2022 that Lyudmila Narusova would resign from the post of Senator, and that instead the Senator’s stern response a day later happened to be: “This is fake, I don’t comment on fakes. Someone really wants that.” Not even the slightest bit of reading into what the last sentence of Ksenia Sobchak’s mother Lyudmila Narusova’s comment may have meant. No! Narusova displayed firm stability, and the Brits didn’t have a useful rumor this time to suggest who might be supporting that person – whether this was a person or ethnicity or anybody. Astonishingly, the British didn’t even have a rumor to claim that Ksenia Sobchak’s father must have been indignant in some way with the allegedly mentored by him then future President Putin, or with the Russians’ way of governing, or altogether with Russia, when he wrote the Russian Constitution in cooperation with an American institution. Alas, there couldn’t be dug out by the British the tiniest rumor about that several decades-old Constitution not providing for a strategy for combating, for example, Russophobia, either internal or external. But there is so much permitted talk by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on what allegedly is missing in Ukrainian national security. Talk about a preference of one form of legislation over another, when the speech is about two state entities which simultaneously came out from one and the same original state – the USSR! No rumor on how the same matter of the missing in the Russian Federation legislation on combating hatred for Russia and the Russians, which includes much more than the term “Russophobia”, is approached and treated in Western European constitutions, either. A large magnitude on the Richter scale tremor must have shaken the British for them to turn to rumors, on which topic the following portion of Scripture here is most appropriate to be quoted: “So the servants of King Hezekiah came to Isaiah. And Isaiah said to them, ‘Thus you shall say to your master, “Thus says the LORD: ‘Do not be afraid of the words which you have heard, with which the servants of the king of Assyria have blasphemed Me. Surely I will send a spirit upon him, and he shall hear a rumor and return to his own land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land.’”’” (2 Kings 19:5-7). Around 700 BC, enemies of God used a false, accusational narrative as warfare against His people, so God sent a Word to strengthen the Judean King Hezekiah in his inner man via the Judean Prophet Isaiah, who was to speak it over the king in the greatest time of need of the Judeans, when they were about to be attacked by the same enemies – the Assyrians. The Judeans were part of God’s plan, and God delivered them by sending a rumor to the enemy’s camp. The Word was devastating for the Assyrians. Were the British falsely accusing the Russian President and the Russians, or were they trying to outwit their enemy the Russians through a forgery of the biblical principle, by putting themselves in the place of God? Regardless of the British scheming, Ksenia Sobchak escaped from Russia to Lithuania via Belarus. On the way to Israel or elsewhere, the then future showed. She returned back to Russia. But it was handy that when having to cross the border on October 26, 2022, she found herself being in possession of Israeli citizenship. President Zelenskyy could have explored his creativity and reached out to adopt Sobchak’s method personally and advertize the same to many in Ukraine who would qualify, and much earlier than the time when Sobchak started paving the way across the border. That would have constituted working toward strengthening his country’s security, right?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was actually born Vladimir and was a Russian and Russian-speaking Jew throughout his life until the launching of Ukraine as a state project post the USSR, and only secondarily learned Ukrainian, mostly from his wife and her family, the Kiyashkos, and also spoke with his former compatriot Vladimir Putin in Russian right until the beginning of the Russian military operation on February 24, 2022, is bound to have noticed that Ukraine has become many Jewish people’s concern. Some of those have gone quite a long way to fabricate lacking any bit of conventionality and rather curious ways to get into the subject, and apparently have done so for many years. In the last week of October 2022, Democratic member of the US House of Representatives Jamin (Jamie) Raskin came into sudden popularity with what he considered an “exposing” bit of information on Russia: “Russia is an Orthodox Christian country with traditional social values, and for that reason it must be destroyed, no matter what the cost to us [the USA]. This is a jihad.” Jamie Raskin’s paternal grandfather’s parents were the ethnic Jewish Shulum Raskin (born 1863 in the contemporary Belarusian territory of the Russian Kingdom) and Dora Daskin/Halbeichy/Richman (born 1860 in the same region). Their son Benjamin Raskin, born 1898, produced Jamie’s father Marcus Raskin in 1934 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, the latter of whom passed for an American social critic, political activist, author and philosopher working for “progressive social change” in the United States. The named Marcus’ mother Anna Goodman (born 1901) was an immigrants’ child, having as parents Matis Abraham Gutnikov (later Goodman) and Sara Goodkin, who had been born in the mid-1800s in the vicinity of Vitebsk, today’s Belarus, then in the Russian Kingdom. On Jamie’s mother’s side, Chaim (Harry) Bellman (born 1881) and Esther Sussman (born 1884) were not precisely identified by documentation Eastern European Jewish immigrants who gave birth to Samuel H. Bellman, Jamie Raskin’s grandfather, in the Bronx, New York in 1906. Samuel Bellman married Sally Finkelstein (born 1907), the daughter of Mordecai (Marcus) Finkelstein (of Eastern European Jewish descent) and Bertha Fogel (of Romanian Jewish origin). Their daughter Barbara Bellman (Jamie’s mother), born 1935 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, married Marcus Raskin. Jamie Raskin was born in 1962 in their family. Barbara Raskin, a chronicler of women’s lives, died at only 63 years of age in 1999. In 1987, aged 51, she authored the bestselling novel “Hot Flashes”, which “progressives” in the USA like Jamie’s father Marcus advertized and propagandized as a book about “the concerns of Barbara’s generation of women”, but actually was a book about the normal physiological changes which take place in the lives of women everywhere, except that in other countries there is not taken the American view of those as definite indicators telling of social, societal, ideological and moral, and not only physical, “abnormalities”, which only in the West and in America are considered large, cover-to-cover, day-to-day, month-to-month, year-to-year, and allegedly decade-to-decade, fillers of the alleged life of a woman in post-industrial Western society. The fact that, as described, Jamin (Jamie) Raskin’s ancestors left the region mostly of pre-Soviet Russia, and as such the family and he personally were cut off from information about what the Soviet Union and contemporary Russia were as state, political, ideological, social and societal entities, not having any exposure to them, their citizens and their culture, shows in his uneducated statement in October 2022, which apparently he meant to address at Russia, but stands to be and is being corrected that he actually meant to direct it at any and all countries and societies which subscribe to and practise some kind of Orthodoxy. Orthodoxy apparently is altogether an enigmatic subject to him as to what exactly it is as a definition and what it comprises of in practise. Representative Jamie Raskin’s state of understanding on the matter may have been catalyzed because of exactly what his parents stood for and were involved with, however the described condition became the fate of many immigrants who, having to face the Western and especially North American culture, appear to have turned to the ideation of “progressivism” as a last solace, simply because they had thrown themselves through their immigrating into an extremely inhospitable environment compared to where they came from and everything they knew about humans and society. They sought to customize just about everything in search of what they considered familiar. That battle was short-lived. Through assimilation, they became something “new”. Today, the reality is that it is commonplace that they and their offspring apply stereotypes to the Russian Federation (and not only it) and practise the “compare and contrast” technique concerning Russia and Ukraine, simply to stabilize their own psyche.

That born in Tsarist Russia Jews who emigrated to the USA kept their hearts warm toward Ukraine and the Ukrainians, especially when they were born in Kiev, is a fact. If what Ksenia Sobchak did was not his thing, President Zelenskyy could have reached out to Donald M. Blinken, former US Ambassador to Hungary, who attended the signing of the original Budapest Memoranda documents in 1994. There was much stuff going on around the world at that time, all of a “democratic” nature, like signing such memoranda full of “guarantees”, or “free elections” in South Africa “for the first time”, for the latter of which to happen and the destruction of the South African Apartheid to be faked Nelson Mandela had been released from prison in 1990 after 27 years of imprisonment on Robben Island. But the Jewish link to the named “destruction of Apartheid” in South Africa is a completely different matter. Before February 19, 2022, nothing could have been easier for Zelenskyy than engaging Donald Blinken, since that one, who recently passed, happened to be the father of current US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The latter even visited Kiev during Zelenskyy’s tenure at the beginning of May 2021, and his father was alive at the time. The Blinkens could have extended, and perhaps in some undisclosed to the public way did extend, love and kindness toward Ukraine. What is the Blinken family involvement with Ukraine, of which Antony’s grandfather and Donald’s father Maurice Blinken was a native, being born and raised in Kiev before emigrating to the United States – or one should rather say being taken out of the country as a child, according to some versions, by his father Meir Blinken in 1904, or according to other versions, being left by the emigrated father, who unfortunately died in America, where Maurice went, having become an orphan at the age of 15? Whichever way it happened, the current US Secretary of State’s story that his grandfather was running away from the anti-Jewish pogroms into a life of emigration to the US doesn’t hold water, because the Kievan pogroms didn’t happen around either of the possible dates for his grandfather Maurice’s emigration. But even if Secretary Blinken is dishonest, it doesn’t mean that he doesn’t have warm feelings toward Ukraine, the Ukrainians or Volodymyr Zelenskyy. With all these facts and meetings being in place, how weren’t they a real and significant way in which President Zelenskyy could have resolved the alleged issues with the security provisions of the Budapest Memorandum? There are a lot of countries which are not in possession of nuclear weapons, for “defense” purposes or otherwise, but they did not take the steps President Zelenskyy took and push to become NATO members.

Of course there was a close call to the Blinkens to show in action their “Jewishness” and “Ukrainianness”, as those are allegedly intertwined for many, according to the claims of dissidents to North America of such extraction. In fact, the region around Odessa in particular, which currently is a Ukrainian territory but previously was part of Tsarist Russia for centuries, and its belonging to Ukraine came only during the very late historic stage when in the realms statehood can be spoken about at all, because the world knew pre-statehood – this region and especially the town of Odessa was known to have become a hub for Jews in the last quarter of the 1800s. It shouldn’t be underestimated that there is a fallacious notion propelled in the West that alleges that city’s almost “Jewishness”. One can say in one sentence in a rather humorous tone that there isn’t a pill for “nostalgia for Odessa”, and even if there was, the ethnically Jewish escapees from that city to the West have the impossible task of convincing the world that that is not the malady they want to try and treat in 2022-2024 with the artificially and purposely constructed “Russia-Ukraine” conflict. It is something to consider that Donald Blinken passed in September 2022 without seeing realized his dream for Odessa to be returned to the “Ukrainian Jews”, who in their circles it goes without saying that the sentiment is that they had spent their lives in running after the “American dream” instead of being in Odessa. Anyone can check firsthand if they want to. Emotions can be killing. Even for others. However, emotional dispositions cannot be alleviated with wars. Didn’t anybody see any clash of interests for the Blinkens? Didn’t and doesn’t anyone find President Zelenskyy’s proposal for Ukraine to join NATO controversial, inappropriate and made by design? Somebody should have, because the Munich Security Conference is said to be the world’s leading forum for debating the most pressing challenges to international security. And the February 19, 2022 one was just one edition of the same. And if Zelenskyy used these Jewish links, which there is no question that he did, all these people had been positioned there on purpose. His shouts “Ukraine is not secured!” were just a ruse!

[…]

G.M.

The “Jewish problem” was part of the “worldwide empire problem” which the Western European monarchs had and have. They are the ones who traditionally used Jews, and, as exemplified by the material above, they had positioned them around Russia, if they couldn’t position them right inside Russia. Their work was comprehensive and all-encompassing, undermining and abusive to the point of total annihilation of individual, ethnic, national and state entities. You can publish this expose of the Western monarchical motives, methods and modus operandi through any outlet anywhere in the world, and be justified and totally satisfied with yourself!

G.M.