US Election Outcome and What it Means for Ukraine, Gaza, and Global Conflicts.

As the world anticipates the outcome of next week’s US presidential election, questions loom about the future of American influence on the global stage.

In a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape, the choice between Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and Republican candidate Donald Trump will shape US foreign policy and its impact on major international conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and beyond.

A Beacon of Democracy or an Isolationist Shift?

The image of US President Joe Biden walking through Kyiv in early 2023, under the sound of air sirens, symbolizes his administration’s firm support for Ukraine against Russian aggression.

Biden has frequently described America as a “beacon to the world,” reinforcing a foreign policy approach that emphasizes international alliances and support for democratic partners. His potential successor and vice president, Kamala Harris, has echoed similar views, emphasizing that America cannot “retreat” in these “unsettled times.”

However, a possible Trump victory presents a starkly different vision. Trump’s “Americanism, not globalism” slogan suggests an America-first approach, where global obligations are secondary to domestic priorities. His past administration highlighted this stance by questioning NATO commitments and prioritizing reduced involvement in global affairs.

NATO and Military Concerns

One critical area affected by the election outcome is NATO and US-European relations. Rose Gottemoeller, former NATO deputy secretary general, warns that a Trump victory could signal uncertain times for NATO. During his previous term, Trump suggested the US might withdraw from NATO, causing alarm among allies who rely heavily on American military support. With the US contributing nearly two-thirds of NATO’s defense budget, Trump’s potential return has revived these concerns across Europe.

Trump argues that his hardline stance is necessary to push NATO allies to increase their military spending to 2% of GDP—a goal only 23 member states achieved in 2024. While some appreciate this approach for burden-sharing, his unpredictable statements continue to unsettle allies. On the other hand, a Harris administration would likely maintain strong NATO ties and continue supporting Ukraine’s defense. However, she is also expected to press Europe to meet spending commitments, ensuring the burden does not fall disproportionately on Washington.

Broader Implications for Global Conflicts

Beyond NATO and Ukraine, the election will affect America’s role in addressing conflicts worldwide, including in Gaza. The conflict between Israel and Hamas has underscored the importance of US diplomacy in the Middle East, where the balance of alliances and aid can shift rapidly. Both candidates bring contrasting perspectives, with Harris likely to adopt a traditional diplomatic role, while Trump’s unpredictability could lead to less conventional approaches.

As regional powers become more assertive, and as countries like China and Russia seek greater influence, America’s role as a stabilizing force is under scrutiny. Many allies worry that a US retreat could embolden autocratic regimes and weaken the multilateral institutions created to promote peace and stability.

A Decisive Election for the World

Ultimately, the US election is not only a choice between two domestic visions but also a decision with far-reaching global consequences. Whether America continues as an active leader in international conflicts or shifts toward a more isolationist stance will impact Ukraine, Gaza, and global stability for years to come. As the world watches, many wonder if the United States will reaffirm its role as a “beacon to the world” or turn inward, reshaping alliances and the international order in the process.

Invest or Donate towards HICGI New Agency Global Media Establishment – Watch video here